Comments on: Gamgee perish

By: vanlandw

vanlandw — Tue, 28 Mar 2006 20:38:39 +0000

clearly you need to update your website :-[

By: bun

bun — Sun, 26 Mar 2006 03:55:18 +0000

the tee is constantly number one. deal with it vanlandw

By: vanlandw

vanlandw — Sun, 19 Mar 2006 20:29:05 +0000

ef you russ…..if you have nothing positive to add to the conversation you shouldn’t say anything at all. without question you are the largest “nub” of all time.

By: bun

bun — Sun, 19 Mar 2006 19:42:35 +0000

ef you guys.

By: vanlandw

vanlandw — Fri, 17 Mar 2006 22:01:43 +0000

you are vanberge4

By: Kramer

Kramer — Fri, 17 Mar 2006 00:11:05 +0000

I too am in agreement, that it should only be a gamgee when gamgee is involved.

By: mickeyvb

mickeyvb — Thu, 16 Mar 2006 23:06:54 +0000

I vote any non-actual-sam-wise-gam-gee action be officially declared a ‘rudy’… michelle got rudy’d, tony got rudy’d…., poor security guard got rudy’d, edgar really got rudy’d, and poor rudy got gamgee’d.

By: vanlandw

vanlandw — Thu, 16 Mar 2006 22:16:56 +0000

i agree with vanberge…..for it to be on the “offical count” the gamgee must involve “gamgee”. when in public it’s ok to say “i just gamgeed russellteee” but to be on the count it must have have included sean astin.

By: vanberge

vanberge — Thu, 16 Mar 2006 17:25:43 +0000

vanlandw – i agree. i’ll try to get that scheduled.

bun – it is my feeling that a gamgee must involve the actual human samwise gamgee. Either on the giving, or receiving end.

By: bun

bun — Thu, 16 Mar 2006 15:27:51 +0000

dude people are going to get gam’d all the time! i consider tony’s death a gam, for example.